A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Of Talazoparib With Enzalutamide In Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Study Identifier:
C3441021
CT.gov Identifier:
EudraCT Identifier:
EU Trial (CTIS) Number:
Study Contact Information:
N/A
Study Complete

Considering participating in a START clinical trial?

Study Summary

To assess radiographic PFS in men with mCRPC (with no systemic treatments initiated after documentation of mCRCP) treated with talazoparib and enzalutamide vs. placebo plus enzalutamide

Part 1:

To confirm the starting dose of talazoparib in combination with each enzalutamide through assessment of target safety events and PK at select sites.

Part 2:

To compare talazoparib plus enzalutamide vs. placebo plus enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC.

Efficacy will be assessed by radiographic assessments every 8 wks through week 25 and every 8-12 wks thereafter.

To demonstrate that talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide is superior to placebo in combination with enzalutamide in prolonging BICR assessed rPFS, in patients with mCRPC unselected for DDR status.

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and (patient) pt-reported outcomes of the combination treatment of TALA (0.5 mg QD) + ENZA (160 mg QD) vs placebo + ENZA.

To evaluate the Talazoparib and enzalutamide are superior to placebo and enzalutamide in prolongs rPFS in mCRPC patients with no choice for DDR status.

To evaluate the Talazoparib and enzalutamide are superior to placebo and enzalutamide prolongs rPFS in mCRPC patients with DDR deficiency.

To compare the rPFS in men with mCRPC treated with talazoparib plus enzalutamide vs. enzalutamide after confirmation of the starting dose of talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide.

To evaluate efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of TALA combined with ENZA.

Efficacy is assessed radiographically every 8 weeks up to Week 25 and every 8–12 weeks thereafter. rPFS will be compared between the two arms

To provide a detailed overview of the safety profile of talazoparib plus enzalutamide in the all-comers population of the TALAPRO-2 trial with the aim of understanding how adverse events were managed

To evaluate talazoparib plus enzalutamide as a first-line treatment in patients with mCRPC, demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in radiographic progression-free survival vs placebo plus enzalutamide in an all-comers population unselected for HRR gene alterations (hazard ratio=0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.78; P<0.0001)

Prospective testing used a 12-gene HRR panel (HRR12) of FoundationOne CDx/FoundationOne Liquid CDx.For single gene groups, only pts bearing alteration(s) in that gene and no other HRR12 genes were analyzed.

Endpoints: ORR, time to progression or death on first subsequent antineoplastic therapy (PFS2), PSA response ≥50%, time to PSA progression (TTPP), and time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy (TTCC)

To analyses of homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene subgroups and potential associations with secondary efficacy endpoints in the HRR-deficient population

Safety assessments

The safety population included patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses evaluated the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), type, severity, timing, seriousness, and relationship to study treatment.

Adverse events were graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), version 4.03 [14]. Adverse events of special interest (AESI) were acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), pneumonitis, venous thromboembolism, and second primary nonhematologic malignancies.

Preferred terms were clustered to better assess hematologic TEAEs where indicated. Anemia: anemia, hematocrit decreased, hemoglobin decreased, red blood cell count decreased. Neutropenia: neutropenia, neutrophil count decreased. Thrombocytopenia: thrombocytopenia, platelet count decreased. Leukopenia: leukopenia, white blood cell count decreased. Lymphopenia: lymphopenia, lymphocyte count decreased.

The objective of this study was to assess the relative efficacy between TALA + ENZA (TALAPRO-2) versus OLAP + AAP (PROpel) and NIRA + AAP (MAGNITUDE) in 1 L mCRPC via a matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (MAIC).

To report updated final PROs for the unselected cohort.

To predict incidence of grade (G)≥3 anemia in pts receiving TALA 0.5 mg (0.35 mg, moderate renal impairment) + ENZA in TALAPRO-2.

Baseline (BL) pt and disease characteristics were used to predict G≥3 anemia after TALA initiation using ML models (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [LASSO] Cox regression, extreme gradient boosting [XGB], survival support vector machine [SVM]). A longitudinal time-varying model was created by further including post-BL hemoglobin measures. Accuracy between models was compared using area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) based on 3-fold cross-validation (CV). Data were truncated at the first of: red blood cell transfusion, dose modification, subsequent antineoplastic tx initiation, date of last contact, death, or data cutoff.

Clinical Study Information for Healthcare Providers

By clicking the button below you will find in-depth information about this clinical trial, including study design, primary and secondary endpoints, and more. This information is intended for healthcare professionals seeking to review the scientific and operational aspects of the study.

Study Locations

Location
Investigator
Status
Condition(s) Treated at Site
Location
START Carolinas
Myrtle Beach, SC, United States, 29572
Investigator
Neal Shore
Status
Recruiting
Condition(s) Treated at Site
Prostate