A Randomized Phase III Study Evaluating Cystectomy With Perioperative Pembrolizumab and Cystectomy With Perioperative Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab Versus Cystectomy Alone in Participants Who Are Cisplatin-Ineligible or Decline Cisplatin With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (KEYNOTE-905/EV-303).

Study Identifier:
MK-3475-905
CT.gov Identifier:
EudraCT Identifier:
EU Trial (CTIS) Number:
Study Contact Information:
Study Complete

Considering participating in a START clinical trial?

Study Summary

To evaluate perioperative pembrolizumab with radical cystectomy + pelvic lymph node dissection (RC+PLND) versus RC+PLND alone in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). To see if pembrolizumab before and after surgery is more effective than surgery alone in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). This will be measured by tissue samples that are taken during surgery as well as imaging performed at different time points Test the safety of the study drug, pembrolizumab, given before and after surgery. To see how well your body handles pembrolizumab, before and after surgery. To see if pembrolizumab and surgery, compared to surgery alone, helps patients have a better quality of life. To see if pembrolizumab helps patients live longer. To Assess the efficacy and safety of perioperative pembrolizumab plus RC + PLND versus perioperative EV with pembrolizumab plus RC + PLDN versus RC + PLND alone for patients with MIBC. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative pembro alone or in combination with EV compared with RC + PLND alone in pts with MIBC who are ineligible for or decline cisplatin-based treatment. Assessments and follow-up On-study tumor imaging assessments to evaluate disease status will be conducted with contrast until an EFS event or discontinuation occurs or at withdrawal of consent All surgical specimens obtained during RC + PLND will be assessed centrally to determine pathologic response Patients with new recurrent/metastatic disease at the 6-week (±14 days) postcystectomy imaging will have met the primary EFS end point and will not receive additional trial therapy but will transition to survival follow-up stage until death, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study All patients will be followed up for OS status until death, withdrawal of consent, or end of study, whichever occurs first AEs will be monitored and assessed by the investigator per CTCAE v4.0 from randomization for up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (90 days for serious AES) Analyses Efficacy The intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients regardless of whether they received treatment) will serve as the analysis population for EFS and OS Patients who discontinue for reasons other than an EFS event will be followed up for posttreatment disease status until an EFS event occurs The nonparametric Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate EFS and OS curves in each treatment group; treatment differences in EFS and OS will be assessed using the stratified log-rank test and will be estimated using the stratified Cox model with the Efron method of handling ties PCR and pDS rates will be analyzed using the stratified Miettinen and Nurminen method with strata weighting by sample size Safety Safety and tolerability analyses (clinical review of all relevant parameters, including AEs, laboratory tests, vital signs, and electrocardiographic measurements) will be conducted on data from all randomly assigned patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment To evaluate neoadjuvant and adjuvant PADCEV in combination with KEYTRUDA or neoadjuvant and adjuvant KEYTRUDA versus surgery alone in patients with MIBC who are either not eligible for or declined cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

To evaluate efficacy and safety of periop EV + pembro and RC + PLND vs RC + PLND in adult pts with MIBC (T2-T4aN0M0 or T1-T4aN1M0) who were cisplatin-ineligible or declined cisplatin.

Clinical Study Information for Healthcare Providers

By clicking the button below you will find in-depth information about this clinical trial, including study design, primary and secondary endpoints, and more. This information is intended for healthcare professionals seeking to review the scientific and operational aspects of the study.

Study Locations

Location
Investigator
Status
Condition(s) Treated at Site
Location
START Carolinas
Myrtle Beach, SC, United States, 29572
Investigator
Neal Shore
Status
Recruitment Complete
Condition(s) Treated at Site
Bladder